Government "intelligence"

Discussion about politicks
Post Reply
User avatar
Outdoorsfool
2018 Member of the Year
Posts: 3321
Joined: March 3rd, 2004, 12:42 pm

Government "intelligence"

Post by Outdoorsfool » March 14th, 2007, 5:20 pm

Our government sure seems to have some fornicated up ideas when it comes to death, dying and our personal wishes. We have laws against suicide and assisted suicide, even when it involves the terminally ill and those suffering from excruciating, uncurable disease and pain. The government can/has stepped in to require elderly and people in vegetative states be kept alive, even to the point of administering pain-relieving drugs in such quantities to keep a person basically comatose. We have more humane options for our pets than we do ourselves when it comes to ending their life. But through it's often convoluted drug policies, the government can enforce their drug laws and effectively kill someone. Is marijuana really more dangerous than 90+% of the drugs they have approved for use??? (I'll even include alcohol and tobacco in those government approved "drugs".)
------------------------------------------------------------
Mar 14, 3:41 PM EDT

Dying Woman Loses Marijuana Appeal

By DAVID KRAVETS
Associated Press Writer

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- A California woman whose doctor says marijuana is the only medicine keeping her alive can face federal prosecution on drug charges, a U.S. appeals court ruled Wednesday.

The case was brought by Angel Raich, an Oakland mother of two who suffers from scoliosis, a brain tumor, chronic nausea and other ailments. On her doctor's advice, she eats or smokes marijuana every couple of hours to ease her pain and bolster a nonexistent appetite as conventional drugs did not work.

The Supreme Court ruled against Raich two years ago, saying that medical marijuana users and their suppliers could be prosecuted for breaching federal drug laws even if they lived in a state such as California where medical pot is legal.

Because of that ruling, the issue before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was narrowed to the so-called right to life theory: that marijuana should be allowed if it is the only viable option to keep a patient alive.

Raich, 41, sobbed when she was told of the decision and said she would continue using the drug.

"I'm sure not going to let them kill me," she said. "Oh my God."

Although the three-judge appeals panel refused Raich's request to block enforcement of the 1970 Controlled Substances Act, it left open the possibility that if she were arrested and prosecuted, she might be able to argue that she possessed marijuana as a last resort to stay alive, in what is known as a "medical necessity defense."

"I have to get myself busted in order to try to save my life," Raich said.

? 2007 The Associated Press.
Politicians are like shoemakers who make pretty shoeboxes but forget to make the shoes.

Post Reply